Throw down what weapons? I'm saying how many nuclear bombs do you need? Are they there for self-defence or injecting fear into countries?

You've bombed 2 cities. No one else has.

You've lost innumerable amounts of nuclear bombs at sea. Even in your country, such as the Savannah bomb in Georgia -- a much bigger bomb than dropped in Japan.

Why should the United States have nuclear bombs and not Iran?

Haven't we been here with Iraq in the past?

Haven't the Americans given Israel several nuclear warheads, when really Israel are the ones invading on Palestinian land?

How many countries do you want to bomb before colonialism is truly effective in your eyes?

How about you let everyone in the world to have 2 nuclear bombs each?

We all know what happens at schools in Britain, we are taught not to retaliate to bullies, can that be a rendition of the way America works?

North Korea has nuclear bombs, they torture their citizens, what's wrong with attacking North Korea if you fancy another disastrous war?

Who's after Iran? Will Syria be accused of destabilising Iran? Will Jordan be accused of destabilising Syria? Will Turkey be accused of destabilising Jordan? Where does it end?

Will Venezuela, an oil rich country, be accused of supporting Ahmadinejad's Iran?

What about the 5 Iranians the United States kidnapped that they haven't returned yet?

How about all the foreign camps for detainees the United States has. Is the jurisdiction in the United States not harsh enough, yet?

People just won't stand for that. People won't stand for Iran being attacked. America has destabilised Afghanistan and Iraq. America is fighting itself into bankruptcy and those FEMA camps, well, I shall wait and see, but I have my suspicious there not for illegal aliens.

The people are awakening to this. I'm by far not the only one, even on TalkFreelance itself who thinks like this.