Originally Posted by Imagenesis There are so many things wrong with that quote.

Care to mention some of those things? Do you actually have a counter-argument?

How about these facts:

-The demo is 560 mb, yet you only get 1 map and a 10 minute round limit. I remember when the UT2003 demo was 140 mb and you could play as long as you want, on several maps.

-The game isn't portable. You basically need a dx9 card to play. There are too many people with Geforce 4s and FX5200s for the developers to ignore.

-The only supported OS is Windows XP!

-It has some _real_ original concepts, like
*aiming down the scope (Call of Duty)
*Red vs. Blue theme (Counter-Strike)

-The demo doesn't even allow you to change your video settings. It decides what detail levels are best for you, and you have to restart the game to change it.

Originally Posted by Imagenesis First of all, this game supports up to 64 players on good computer so I think you should do your research before bitching.

What's your point? MMoRPGs support thousands of players. Does that mean the game runs efficiently? The fact is that Battlefield Vietnam is a system hog that runs way too slowly.

Originally Posted by Imagenesis Thirdly, your card is VERY far from good in todays standard.

Huh? I never told you what video card I had.