Derek, I'm confused. Where, in my entire post that you apparently failed to read, did I mention anything about a blog? It's not a blog. It's not intended to look like a blog. I don't
do blogs. You also seem to have the impression that I'm trying a new thing here, that I'm experimenting to see if it will work, if I can bring in the customers. You probably didn't notice the link to the
current website that we've been running for the past year and a half that gets over 10,000 hits a month. That's just over a third of the people in our region. And it's about 3/4 of the animal owners in our region (that is, our demographic). I'd say it's working pretty well, despite our competition having a comparatively
prettier website.
I love that you think that pop culture has anything whatsoever to do with marketing medical services. It's really quite hilarious. You see, unless you're Jessica Simpson you really don't care which vet is the coolest or best-dressed around (if you did, my dad would certainly be out of business). You care about who does the best job.
Forgetting that for a second, I should point out that this website isn't really about marketing at all. GVH had a well-established client base long before we had a website, and despite there now being another vet clinic in the area, we still effectively have a monopoly in the area. We don't have to worry about pulling in the customers so much.
Again, this is an early-stage site. As I mentioned previously I am waiting on logos and stuff like that from my father. Once we're done it will look a lot more like a vet hospital website, I promise.
Anyway, I do agree with some of your points somewhat. We do definitely need to sit down and plan certain messages we want to get across - at the moment the site is simply a bunch of articles grouped into a few categories. It does need a bit more organisation.
sskhalsa, thank you for your constructive criticism. I do agree with you about the header part, now that I'm looking at it on my lower res (1024x768) screen.