|
|
|
|
Thread title: McCain's new VP |
|
|
|
|
|
Thread tools
Search this thread
Display Modes
|
|
08-29-2008, 06:12 PM
|
#1
|
Status: I'm new around here
Join date: Aug 2008
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 24
|
McCain's new VP
John McCain announced his VP running mate as Alaska Governor Sarah Palin.
I guess McCain is trying to say he is the right choice for women voters by selecting a women running mate? I bet Obama is kicking himself for not choosing Hillary?
|
|
08-29-2008, 06:17 PM
|
#2
|
Status: #pugs {display: block;}
Join date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Expertise: CSS, HTML, PHP
Software: Sublime Text 2
Posts: 1,187
|
Obama is certainly not kicking himself for not choosing Hilary.
|
|
08-29-2008, 06:30 PM
|
#3
|
Status: Pastafarian
Join date: May 2006
Location: Duct Taped to your Ceiling
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 3,440
|
No he (Obama) isn't. Biden has the bite, the backing, and the 30+ years of experience that he needed. Biden is top choice. Odama is so damn polite when people attack him or his ideals, but Biden? He can string together verbal abuse and top hat rhetoric that would make war monger Cheney weep.
That's not to say this isn't a cirve ball for the Obama camp; it is. It's unexpected, and an unexpected even is always of concern.
McCain is trying to lure over the women who are upset over Hillary, hoping that they will be ruled by their emotions rather than their logic and vote for him because he has a woman VP.
Women everywhere should be insulted.
|
|
08-29-2008, 08:01 PM
|
#4
|
Status: #pugs {display: block;}
Join date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Expertise: CSS, HTML, PHP
Software: Sublime Text 2
Posts: 1,187
|
Originally Posted by Awesome
Women everywhere should be insulted.
|
Well, I think women (and myself) where insulted with his decision with abortion, so I think him picking a women VP to win more votes, just puts more icing on the cake that he's a ****tard.
*waves Obama flag*
LOL @ Okaymatt's reasoning with Sarah. I rofl'd so hard.
And I'm with Awesome on the guns bit. I myself have a Glock, and it's hardly swayed my decision. That and the local range near my place has a Obama banner stuck next to their billboard.
|
|
08-29-2008, 08:47 PM
|
#5
|
Status: Member
Join date: Apr 2007
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 174
|
Originally Posted by jordanriane
And I'm with Awesome on the guns bit. I myself have a Glock, and it's hardly swayed my decision. That and the local range near my place has a Obama banner stuck next to their billboard.
|
So in theory your "range" is not business smart as they would lose their clientele, dumb dumb business Democrats.
|
|
08-29-2008, 09:38 PM
|
#6
|
Status: #pugs {display: block;}
Join date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Expertise: CSS, HTML, PHP
Software: Sublime Text 2
Posts: 1,187
|
Originally Posted by okaymatt
So in theory your "range" is not business smart as they would lose their clientele, dumb dumb business Democrats.
|
Because not voting for someone based one their stance on just GUNS is a right to not support Obama? STFU PLS!
Are you even old enough to vote?
|
|
08-29-2008, 10:32 PM
|
#7
|
Status: Member
Join date: Apr 2007
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 174
|
Originally Posted by jordanriane
Because not voting for someone based one their stance on just GUNS is a right to not support Obama? STFU PLS!
Are you even old enough to vote?
|
When the company is a SHOOTING RANGE, smart one, it determines A LOT!
Think about guns = people going to shooting range, no guns = no shooting range's.
One issue? This is a HUGE ISSUE smart one. Think about how many people this would effect. And yes, I am 19.
Originally Posted by Garrett
"Sarah's pretty attractive...lol", you shouldn't be allowed to vote then. What ideas of hers do you support then? Of course there are the default republican stand points, but what about her makes her better than Biden?
|
I shouldn't be allowed to vote because I said that? But you think you can because you think Arnold could be a VP? We both made accusations, think about it before you reply.
All you need to know is Democrats want to TAKE from RICH, give to POOR. Period.
Originally Posted by Awesome
Uh, she isn't a senator you idiot.
Check. Mate. You no longer hold validity on this discussion. lol. And a little FYI, Alaskan governors generally have a higher approval rate on average, though her approval rating is NOT 90%, it was at 90% before sh illegally fired an official, for which she is under investigation.
|
It was a typo, calm the hell down. And her rating is still valid, as that does not have a effect on it.
Awesome, you are just a liberal. To radical to realize what a socialist Obama would do.
|
|
08-29-2008, 06:32 PM
|
#8
|
Status: Senior Member
Join date: Oct 2006
Location: New York
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 774
|
As long as Obama stops biden and the RIAA, eveything will be good
|
|
08-29-2008, 07:10 PM
|
#9
|
Status: Pastafarian
Join date: May 2006
Location: Duct Taped to your Ceiling
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 3,440
|
After spending some time reading about this woman, shes a joke. She has no applicable political experience (mayor of a town of 9k people? lol), shes under investigation by Alaskan authorities, she has 5 kids... though to her credit she apparently 'fought corruption' in her tiny little town, lol.
Desperate choice by a desperate man, desperate to preserve the status quo.
|
|
08-29-2008, 07:11 PM
|
#10
|
Status: Member
Join date: Apr 2007
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 174
|
Obama will screw the United States, it never has worked in the history of any country to tax the rich and give to the poor....who the heck employees a majority of the work force in the US?
Also, with Obama wanting all those changes to the 2nd Amendment, he will get NO hunters, or people who like guns to vote for him.
My two cents; Barry loses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|