|
|
|
|
Thread title: New skin discussion |
|
|
Page 3 of 26 |
< |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
13 |
> |
|
|
|
Thread tools
Search this thread
Display Modes
|
|
08-14-2007, 09:25 PM
|
#21
|
Status: Sin Binner
Join date: Nov 2006
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 634
|
|
|
08-14-2007, 09:27 PM
|
#22
|
Status: I Code Things
Join date: Aug 2005
Location: UK
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 1,998
|
Personally i'm not a fan of where the threads and stuff are shown it needs to be bigger but i could get used to it once its live i'd like to have the option to change back to this skin though. Also the av they use is really cool:
|
|
08-14-2007, 09:36 PM
|
#23
|
Status: Senior Member
Join date: Oct 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 891
|
.............................
|
|
08-14-2007, 09:36 PM
|
#24
|
Status: Community Archaeologist
Join date: Jul 2004
Location: Scotland
Expertise: Software Development
Software: vim, PHP
Posts: 3,820
|
I very rarely browse the forum front page, so what really interests me is how the postbit is going to look! From the looks of it, we'll be going from blue and green to beige and orange. I'm not too sure if reading on beige would beat reading on blue, but that remains to be seen.
Hopefully we'll be able to make proper comments on it pretty soon, once it goes live.
|
|
08-14-2007, 09:40 PM
|
#25
|
Status: I love this place
Join date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 562
|
It's different which I like as I think talkfreelance needs a change.
|
|
08-14-2007, 09:46 PM
|
#26
|
Status: Member
Join date: Jan 2007
Location: England
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 229
|
Originally Posted by Salathe
I very rarely browse the forum front page, so what really interests me is how the postbit is going to look! From the looks of it, we'll be going from blue and green to beige and orange. I'm not too sure if reading on beige would beat reading on blue, but that remains to be seen.
Hopefully we'll be able to make proper comments on it pretty soon, once it goes live.
|
Viewforum:
http://www.4design.tv/talkfreelance-skin/forum.htm
Postbit:
http://www.4design.tv/talkfreelance-skin/thread.htm
I personally like the design, apart from the fact that it is way too busy. Although, it doesn't strike me as what talkfreelance is. It would work much better on a different forum. However, i think people could easily grow to like this new design, designs take time to grow on people.
|
|
08-14-2007, 09:49 PM
|
#27
|
Status: Ruby on Rails Developer
Join date: Oct 2004
Location: England, UK
Expertise: Ruby, Rails, jQuery
Software: Chocolat, Sublime Text 3
Posts: 2,343
|
|
|
08-14-2007, 09:50 PM
|
#28
|
Status: Geek
Join date: Apr 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Expertise: Software
Software: Chrome, Notepad++
Posts: 6,894
|
Originally Posted by Josué
So far, Wildhoney has provided the most sensible feedback, and to an extent, I agree with his points (attracts the eyes to the sides, color scheme is not the best, heavy with graphics, albeit quality graphics).
Yet, what moves me to repeatedly defend this skin, is not the fact that most designers could not produce graphics of its quality and, above all, crispness, but the fact that after the implementation of the other new skin, 4design.tv was actually the most suggested and recommended designer by talkfreelance's members.
Now, after Big Zee listened to them, they turn to take this hypocritical stance and criticize the skin. While I personally don't prefer 4design.tv (I recommended somebody else), I reasoned it would be much more thoughtful to accommodate to the change and, if I disliked some portions about it, tell Big Zee about it in a constructive manner, much unlike what the majority of people have done so far.
After all, they did urge for 4design.tv and push Big Zee to spend x,xxx on a skin from them.
|
I seriously doubt zee used them on account of what the users suggested. Either way, this mess wouldn't happen if he didn't stay so damn secretive about it, but even after the last disaster he wouldnt do it. What happened is because of zees ignorance, not the users misjudgment. If we saw this skin in the early stages he could have fired the designer and saved lots of money.
|
|
08-14-2007, 09:59 PM
|
#29
|
Status: Request a custom title
Join date: Dec 2005
Location: Colchester, UK
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 4,625
|
Nice to see 4design did their research.
It's not that bad once you look past the atrocious table headers.
As said above, it doesn't give that 'TalkFreelance' feel.
The current skin is going to be kept in the style switcher, and noone here is owed a new skin for TFL.
So just consider yourself lucky that the staff have gone out of their way to provide one at all.
Originally Posted by Village Idiot
-New VB features
|
Care to enlighten me as to where they are?
|
|
08-14-2007, 10:05 PM
|
#30
|
Status: Hey, I'm Steven
Join date: Feb 2007
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 1,212
|
What can I say that hasn't already been said?
Design wise, I can appreciate all of the hard work which has gone into creating it. Aesthetically, it's very pleasing. But when taking functionality and accessibility into account, I think it's let down.
It looks like someone has tried to squash to many items into a suit case, and everything just burst out. It's too cluttered in my opinion. You're constantly being distracted by all of the surrounding graphics.
I don't like the threads section either. It's just too hard to read! Everything has been given too little space to breathe, creating a cluttered feeling.
Over time, and after using it for a while, I think we will all grow to like it. Some people are stubborn towards change, but change isn't always a bad thing!
It's a lovely looking skin, and with some tweaks could work really well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 3 of 26 |
< |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
13 |
> |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|