Dreamweaver can code complaint tableless css, but again it is all down to the user.
|
uhh, dw doesn't code, it makes coding easier.
This is the crap that comes out of imageready.......
|
imageready is hardly considered an html editor.
I've noticed from my experience with Dreamweaver, as is any other editor, adds un-necessary coding to the documents.
|
it all depends on your settings. i'm not even sure what add-ons people are talking about as i've never had issues with such a thing. dw has the little help pop-ups for coding, but it doesn't add anything that you don't tell it to.
Does GoLive help with CSS?
|
not a personal preference, or maybe, but no, golive is an inferior html editor which i compare to frontpage. i've used it and prefer dw.
Even though the code is not stable isn't it faster to fix it up than to do it from scratch?
|
possibly, depends on how bad the code is...
Because most people in the business don't have the money to...
|
if it's a business, you should have the finances to purchase professional software.
think back for a moment, and then type everything down...
|
depends on your typing skills
to be honest, dw is just like any software, it's the user that makes it effective or a waste. there are benefits to using software as opposed to a simple text editor. but, it all depends on developer preference and convenience. as a professional, i think of it as investing in something that will bring a benefit to my clients in turn benefiting my business.
i have nothing against text editors or individuals who prefer to hand-code. if that's what they prefer, than by all means do it. with my background in design and growing knowledge of standards-based development, i can use dw efficiently and effectively.