|
 |
|
|
|
| Thread title: Bad Shared Hosting Neighborhood |
 |
|
|
| |
|
Thread tools
Search this thread
Display Modes
|
|
|
12-24-2010, 06:58 PM
|
#1
|
Status: Member
Join date: May 2010
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 118
|
 Bad Shared Hosting Neighborhood
I know there are a lot of speculations to this topic: "if you share a server (IP address), with sites that have bad reputation, for whatever reason, your site can be blacklisted by search engines. Is this really true? I'm specifically interested in your experiences.
|
|
|
|
12-24-2010, 07:32 PM
|
#2
|
Status: Geek
Join date: Apr 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Expertise: Software
Software: Chrome, Notepad++
Posts: 6,894
|
Sites are often blacklisted via IP, so I find that very feasible. Back when I was on a shared host my mail servers got blacklistd by Yahoo for a few days due to the activity of one of the sites on the IP I was on.
|
|
|
|
12-25-2010, 05:26 AM
|
#3
|
Status: Member
Join date: Mar 2010
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 177
|
That's true but that doesn't seem to be fair. Most small and middle websites (or maybe most websites?) are hosted on shared hosting servers. Is there any way to blacklist the "bad boys" other than banning their shared IP's?
|
|
|
|
12-25-2010, 08:18 PM
|
#4
|
Status: Geek
Join date: Apr 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Expertise: Software
Software: Chrome, Notepad++
Posts: 6,894
|
Shared hosting is overall a crap market even at it's peak. The fact of the matter is if you want quality you at least need a VPS.
|
|
|
|
12-26-2010, 03:08 AM
|
#5
|
Status: Member
Join date: Mar 2010
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 177
|
I agree with that. The problem is that not every webmaster/web owner can afford a VPS, and not every website generates enough profit so that it deserves to be hosted on a VPS.
|
|
|
|
12-26-2010, 03:36 AM
|
#6
|
Status: Geek
Join date: Apr 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Expertise: Software
Software: Chrome, Notepad++
Posts: 6,894
|
Its just the way it is though, chances are if it doesn't make enough profit to pay for a VPS it is not a great business. Low monetary services have high costs of their own, case in point the issue of this discussion.
IP is really the only way to do any of it, there is no magic way to determine what comes from where aside from that.
|
|
|
|
12-27-2010, 12:51 PM
|
#7
|
Status: Member
Join date: Dec 2010
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 162
|
|
|
|
|
01-11-2011, 05:13 AM
|
#8
|
Status: I'm new around here
Join date: Jan 2011
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 18
|
You just need a website and wish to pay $1, what you expect is to have a good service for $20. However, $1 is enough if you just want a website.
|
|
|
|
01-11-2011, 04:04 PM
|
#9
|
Status: Member
Join date: May 2010
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 118
|
That is why I use dedicated IP for sites I really care about and want to make huge profit with. All new sites go to shared accounts until they prove their worth.
|
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 10:44 AM
|
#10
|
Status: I'm new around here
Join date: Jan 2011
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 18
|
Originally Posted by Village Genius 
Shared hosting is overall a crap market even at it's peak. The fact of the matter is if you want quality you at least need a VPS.
|
VPS is not the best solution because it is still on a dedicated server and the IP you got might have already been blacklisted.
Get your own server is not the best solution either because you can use the money to by a bigger TV, why not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
|
|
Forum Contains New Posts 
Forum Contains No New Posts 
Forum is Closed