Today's Posts Follow Us On Twitter! TFL Members on Twitter  
Forum search: Advanced Search  
Navigation
Marketplace
  Members Login:
Lost password?
  Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 24,254
Total Threads: 80,792
Total Posts: 566,471
There are 1130 users currently browsing (tf).
 
  Our Partners:
 
  TalkFreelance     Design and Development     HTML/XHTML/DHTML/CSS :

100% or fixed width?

Thread title: 100% or fixed width?
Closed Thread  
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
    Thread tools Search this thread Display Modes  
05-21-2005, 04:29 AM
#1
DateinaDash is offline DateinaDash
Status: The BidMaster
Join date: Nov 2004
Location: England
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 10,821
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

DateinaDash is on a distinguished road

  Old  100% or fixed width?

What is the best to use for a website? Talkfreelance is fixed width but in the next version (probably late summer) i'm thinking about making it 100% width so it adapts to different resolutions etc.

I do like being able to specify the exact width but it doesn't have as much flexibility as 100% can offer. Take for example when you try and insert an image into a post and it's larger than the width of the board, it screws up.

What do you think is better? Are there any real benefits of fixed width?

05-21-2005, 04:51 AM
#2
Stephen is offline Stephen
Status: Sin Binner
Join date: Jan 2005
Location: Great Britain
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 1,106
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

Stephen is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to Stephen Send a message via MSN to Stephen

  Old

Well usability wise I think 100% is alot better! My next redesign is going to be 100% it just look more professional imo. Fixed width looks nice though but not to practical with such big resolutions and pc's now.

05-21-2005, 05:13 AM
#3
schroder is offline schroder
schroder's Avatar
Status: Member
Join date: Nov 2004
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 159
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

schroder is on a distinguished road

  Old

I think sites with a fixed layout, like this site, are pleasant to the eye. It gives a variation as well.

On the other hand, sites with a lot of content that have a very compacted layout just scare me. MSN would be an example. CNN kind of does the same thing but the way they have their layout setup it’s less offending.

05-21-2005, 05:59 AM
#4
Julian is offline Julian
Status: Simply to simplify
Join date: Apr 2005
Location: Foxton, Manawatu, New Zealand
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 5,572
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

Julian is on a distinguished road

  Old

I think in your case Robson, is to implement a fluid 100% layout.

Forums, as you say, need to be able to expand widthwise to enable users to view larger images.

Each website must be designed according to needs.

05-21-2005, 06:01 AM
#5
Stephen is offline Stephen
Status: Sin Binner
Join date: Jan 2005
Location: Great Britain
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 1,106
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

Stephen is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to Stephen Send a message via MSN to Stephen

  Old

Just set it from say 780px to 80%... I try to do all my sites like that now, It shows a background but is nearly fluid to..

05-21-2005, 07:16 AM
#6
zombielol. is offline zombielol.
Status: I'm new around here
Join date: May 2005
Location: brisbane|australia.
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 15
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

zombielol. is on a distinguished road

Send a message via MSN to zombielol.

  Old

keep it fixed but install a hack for when the images are too large, it creates a button/link which when you hover over, the image is shown. there is a hack like this used on designworldwide.com though i think dimitry (the original) owner made it himself.

05-21-2005, 12:06 PM
#7
Joe is offline Joe
Status: Custom User Title
Join date: Apr 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 2,297
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

Joe is on a distinguished road

  Old

A fluid layout would be nice. But 100% would be too big imo. There needs to be some space at the side of the site or it will look a bit too crowded.

~ Joe

05-21-2005, 08:11 PM
#8
Bennett is offline Bennett
Status: Narassist
Join date: May 2005
Location: USA
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 4,469
iTrader: 32 / 100%
 

Bennett is on a distinguished road

Send a message via MSN to Bennett

  Old

I personally like that some websites are restricted.. It makes them not seem so huge and overwhelming. Some users like things smaller for them to feel more "at home" on them.

05-21-2005, 08:15 PM
#9
seen.to is offline seen.to
seen.to's Avatar
Status: unusual suspect ™
Join date: Feb 2005
Location: Lancaster, PA from London UK
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 1,814
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

seen.to is on a distinguished road

  Old

I have a real dislike for fluid/100% width layouts myself. Makes things totally unreadable on higher resolutions such as I use (1600x1200).

Fixed is best IMO. With a fixed width I know how the site is going to look on anyones machine, (unless they change text size).

05-21-2005, 10:08 PM
#10
sysblnk is offline sysblnk
Status: I love this place
Join date: Mar 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 640
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

sysblnk is on a distinguished road

  Old

I agree with Julian it depends on the sites needs. In a forum I feel that Fluid is better but thats just my opinion.

Closed Thread  
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

  Posting Rules  
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump:
 
  Contains New Posts Forum Contains New Posts   Contains No New Posts Forum Contains No New Posts   A Closed Forum Forum is Closed