Today's Posts Follow Us On Twitter! TFL Members on Twitter  
Forum search: Advanced Search  
Navigation
Marketplace
  Members Login:
Lost password?
  Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 24,254
Total Threads: 80,792
Total Posts: 566,471
There are 1193 users currently browsing (tf).
 
  Our Partners:
 
  TalkFreelance     Design and Development     HTML/XHTML/DHTML/CSS :

Bold vs. Strong

Thread title: Bold vs. Strong
Reply  
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
    Thread tools Search this thread Display Modes  
05-04-2009, 02:55 PM
#1
buddhi225 is offline buddhi225
Status: I'm new around here
Join date: May 2009
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 13
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

buddhi225 is on a distinguished road

  Old  Bold vs. Strong

I see every source saying to use <strong> instead of <b> yet both seem to work fine. Can someone explain why this is? Did the w3 consortium arbitrarily decide this?

Reply With Quote
05-04-2009, 06:11 PM
#2
Verayer is offline Verayer
Status: Member
Join date: Oct 2006
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 151
iTrader: 1 / 100%
 

Verayer is on a distinguished road

  Old

b is depricated, it's advised to use strong (according w3c)

Reply With Quote
05-05-2009, 05:30 AM
#3
rochow is offline rochow
rochow's Avatar
Status: Member
Join date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 297
iTrader: 4 / 100%
 

rochow is on a distinguished road

Send a message via MSN to rochow Send a message via Skype™ to rochow

  Old

<strong> = it requires bold emphasise
Code:
This is the <strong>best site ever!</strong>
<b> = some text is bold for ****s and giggles (when bold adds no semantic meaning, such as breaking up a URL to make it visually easier to read, or because your branding has a normal word and a bold word)
Code:
my<b>pony</b>site.<b>com</b>
Visually is there a difference? No. Browsers will bold both for backward compatibility. Screen readers however will read differently for <strong>, and continue normally for <b>. A valid strict alternative is <span> with a class... visually it can be bolded, yet semantically has no more meaning than any other words around it.

You can simple read the text... if when speaking you emphasise the word it should have <em> or <strong>, if you don't then it doesn't. Think a TV ad, it yells certain bits at you that is more important than the rest.

Reply With Quote
05-11-2009, 05:42 PM
#4
zoliky is offline zoliky
Status: I'm new around here
Join date: May 2009
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 12
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

zoliky is on a distinguished road

  Old

<b> is deprecated, at least in xhtml strict.

Reply With Quote
05-14-2009, 11:12 PM
#5
jasonstockman is offline jasonstockman
Status: I'm new around here
Join date: May 2009
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 23
iTrader: 1 / 100%
 

jasonstockman is on a distinguished road

  Old

strong isnt required to be bold either, you can make the text a different color or give it a background color. The definition for B however is stricly bold faced font style.

Reply With Quote
05-19-2009, 02:22 PM
#6
iamnern is offline iamnern
Status: I'm new around here
Join date: May 2009
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 10
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

iamnern is on a distinguished road

  Old

it's the same

Reply With Quote
05-27-2009, 10:07 PM
#7
pixolia is offline pixolia
Status: I'm new around here
Join date: May 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 14
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

pixolia is on a distinguished road

  Old

I'd suggest using <strong></strong> instead of <b></b>, as zoliky said earlier:
Originally Posted by zoliky View Post
<b> is deprecated, at least in xhtml strict.
It's all basically semantics and is ultimately up to you. My preference is using <strong> and <em> versus <b> and <i>.

Reply With Quote
05-28-2009, 08:32 AM
#8
rochow is offline rochow
rochow's Avatar
Status: Member
Join date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 297
iTrader: 4 / 100%
 

rochow is on a distinguished road

Send a message via MSN to rochow Send a message via Skype™ to rochow

  Old

Originally Posted by pixolia View Post
I'd suggest using <strong></strong> instead of <b></b>, as zoliky said earlier:


It's all basically semantics and is ultimately up to you. My preference is using <strong> and <em> versus <b> and <i>.
There isn't a preference - it's either <b>, or it's either <strong>. They are semantically different.

Reply With Quote
05-30-2009, 12:52 AM
#9
danstrog is offline danstrog
danstrog's Avatar
Status: Junior Member
Join date: May 2009
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 65
iTrader: 1 / 100%
 

danstrog is on a distinguished road

  Old

<b> is deprecated in xHTML, so I would recommend to use <strong>. I personally use only <strong>.

Reply With Quote
06-24-2009, 11:22 AM
#10
dgryan is offline dgryan
Status: Member
Join date: Jun 2009
Location: Syndey
Expertise: Ruby On Rails
Software:
 
Posts: 109
iTrader: 3 / 100%
 

dgryan is on a distinguished road

Send a message via Skype™ to dgryan

  Old

if its only for a certain part, id add it into the css file >.> font-weight:bold

Reply With Quote
Reply  
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

  Posting Rules  
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump:
 
  Contains New Posts Forum Contains New Posts   Contains No New Posts Forum Contains No New Posts   A Closed Forum Forum is Closed