|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
Thread tools
Search this thread
Display Modes
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 06:33 PM
|
#11
|
Status: Superstar
Join date: Apr 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 4,449
|
Each of you are wrong.
Web 3.0 is just the bug fix for 2.0 essentially eliminating the <b> tag in favor of <strong>.
|
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 10:46 PM
|
#12
|
Status: Member
Join date: Nov 2007
Location: Wales
Expertise: Development
Software: TextMate, Transmit, Photoshop.
Posts: 242
|
Originally Posted by Jeff Andersen 
Each of you are wrong.
Web 3.0 is just the bug fix for 2.0 essentially eliminating the <b> tag in favor of <strong>.
|
You're stupid.
As is this thread. Please close.
|
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 11:03 PM
|
#13
|
Status: Superstar
Join date: Apr 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 4,449
|
|
|
|
|
11-09-2009, 08:37 PM
|
#14
|
Status: design rockstar
Join date: Jan 2005
Location: guelph, ontario
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 2,246
|
i still hit people when they ask if i can make something "web2".
the versioning is the stupidest mentality ever. things evolve at a continuous rate. there's no level of separation because there's aren't static states to compare against. it's a buzzword and it's annoying.
if i ever get asked to make something web3 i'm going to up the ante and start cutting throats.
edit: i think someone developed some kind of new technology in the time i spent writing my complaint. i guess the web has upgraded to 2.948563363?
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 10:49 AM
|
#15
|
Status: Resident Epistemologist
Join date: Jan 2006
Location: London, UK
Expertise: Investment, SEO, Marketing
Software: After Effects, Photoshop, Maya
Posts: 1,275
|
Originally Posted by Jeff Andersen
Each of you are wrong.
Web 3.0 is just the bug fix for 2.0 essentially eliminating the <b> tag in favor of <strong>.
|
This made me laugh.
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 11:12 AM
|
#16
|
Status: Paladin
Join date: Jul 2006
Location: Sheffield, UK
Expertise: design, front-end markup
Software: Photoshop
Posts: 2,353
|
HAHAHAHAHAH, so many big noobs.
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 07:13 PM
|
#17
|
Status: Geek
Join date: Apr 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Expertise: Software
Software: Chrome, Notepad++
Posts: 6,894
|
Originally Posted by derek lapp
i still hit people when they ask if i can make something "web2".
the versioning is the stupidest mentality ever. things evolve at a continuous rate. there's no level of separation because there's aren't static states to compare against. it's a buzzword and it's annoying.
if i ever get asked to make something web3 i'm going to up the ante and start cutting throats.
edit: i think someone developed some kind of new technology in the time i spent writing my complaint. i guess the web has upgraded to 2.948563363?
|
Well said.
|
|
|
|
11-11-2009, 01:02 PM
|
#18
|
Status: Member
Join date: Aug 2008
Location: Hampshire, UK
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 202
|
Originally Posted by Jeff Andersen
Each of you are wrong.
Web 3.0 is just the bug fix for 2.0 essentially eliminating the <b> tag in favor of <strong>.
|
 wow
|
|
|
|
11-11-2009, 01:16 PM
|
#19
|
Status: I'm new around here
Join date: Jul 2009
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 22
|
Never heard of web 3.0 :O
|
|
|
|
11-11-2009, 02:52 PM
|
#20
|
Status: Paladin
Join date: Jul 2006
Location: Sheffield, UK
Expertise: design, front-end markup
Software: Photoshop
Posts: 2,353
|
There is no such thing topto1. There's no such thing as web 2.0 either. Just words of self inflicted desire to think one knows what one talks about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
|
|
Forum Contains New Posts 
Forum Contains No New Posts 
Forum is Closed