Today's Posts Follow Us On Twitter! TFL Members on Twitter  
Forum search: Advanced Search  
Navigation
Marketplace
  Members Login:
Lost password?
  Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 24,254
Total Threads: 80,792
Total Posts: 566,472
There are 1627 users currently browsing (tf).
 
  Our Partners:
 
  TalkFreelance     Design and Development     HTML/XHTML/DHTML/CSS :

Bold vs. Strong

Thread title: Bold vs. Strong
Reply    
    Thread tools Search this thread Display Modes  
07-31-2009, 02:05 AM
#1
insub2 is offline insub2
Status: Member
Join date: Jun 2007
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 136
iTrader: 1 / 100%
 

insub2 is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to insub2

  Old

I'm surprised that there is so much discussion on the matter. And now I add another comment.

To all that have said that it is up to preference, are wrong. Well, that is if your goal is being a good coder.

<b> is depreciated in both XHTML 1.1 and HTML 4. That means don't use it! Yes, browsers will still render it correctly but that is because there are so many old pages (and bad coders) left on the web.

Someone mentioned above that screen readers will read <strong> tags differently. That is what semantic code is about. The purpose of markup is to add meaning to your content. Period. End of story. Everything visual ought be done with CSS.

Use <strong> and <em> for strong and emphasized text. Don't use <b> and <i>.

Reply With Quote
Reply    


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 

  Posting Rules  
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump:
 
  Contains New Posts Forum Contains New Posts   Contains No New Posts Forum Contains No New Posts   A Closed Forum Forum is Closed