Today's Posts Follow Us On Twitter! TFL Members on Twitter  
Forum search: Advanced Search  
Navigation
Marketplace
  Members Login:
Lost password?
  Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 24,254
Total Threads: 80,792
Total Posts: 566,472
There are 1757 users currently browsing (tf).
 
  Our Partners:
 
  TalkFreelance     TalkFreelance Information     General Discussion :

McCain's new VP

Thread title: McCain's new VP
Closed Thread    
    Thread tools Search this thread Display Modes  
08-29-2008, 09:25 PM
#1
okaymatt is offline okaymatt
Status: Member
Join date: Apr 2007
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 174
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

okaymatt is on a distinguished road

  Old

Originally Posted by Garrett View Post
*sigh*
In my opinion, McCain chose a woman VP because of trying to sway Hillarys voters. Which they shouldn't change based on gender, once again. You would think McCain would be more worried on right winged people who have a higher electoral chance of getting him in.
Yeah it was a good try on the California lol!

But I believe that you are wrong on his reason for choosing her, she is an amazing senator, and the highest approval rating over any other in the USA. I think its more then just "votes" or else he wouldn't select a state with such few people.

08-29-2008, 09:42 PM
#2
Garrett is offline Garrett
Status: Waving
Join date: Aug 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 2,694
iTrader: 11 / 100%
 

Garrett is on a distinguished road

Send a message via MSN to Garrett

  Old

Originally Posted by okaymatt View Post
Yeah it was a good try on the California lol!

But I believe that you are wrong on his reason for choosing her, she is an amazing senator, and the highest approval rating over any other in the USA. I think its more then just "votes" or else he wouldn't select a state with such few people.
You don't understand, I WASN'T saying he should focus on California or ANYTHING about California other than their electoral power, nothing else.

Amazing Senator? Did you read what Awesome said at all? She has less time than Obama. What about all the other people? Your votes determine where your electoral votes go, she has the fewest to give. From what I can see, you like her "Sarah's pretty attractive...lol", you shouldn't be allowed to vote then. What ideas of hers do you support then? Of course there are the default republican stand points, but what about her makes her better than Biden?

If you can prove to me that there aren't any other right winged governors that have served longer than her and can't get more than 3 electoral votes, then I will go with you. He is playing the Hillary card.

08-29-2008, 09:43 PM
#3
Awesome is offline Awesome
Awesome's Avatar
Status: Pastafarian
Join date: May 2006
Location: Duct Taped to your Ceiling
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 3,440
iTrader: 26 / 93%
 

Awesome is on a distinguished road

  Old

Originally Posted by okaymatt View Post
Yeah it was a good try on the California lol!

But I believe that you are wrong on his reason for choosing her, she is an amazing senator, and the highest approval rating over any other in the USA. I think its more then just "votes" or else he wouldn't select a state with such few people.
Uh, she isn't a senator you idiot.

Check. Mate. You no longer hold validity on this discussion. lol. And a little FYI, Alaskan governors generally have a higher approval rate on average, though her approval rating is NOT 90%, it was at 90% before sh illegally fired an official, for which she is under investigation.

Closed Thread    


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

  Posting Rules  
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump:
 
  Contains New Posts Forum Contains New Posts   Contains No New Posts Forum Contains No New Posts   A Closed Forum Forum is Closed